아주대학교

목차

I. Introduction 1
1.1 Background of the Study 1
1.2 Problem Statement 2
1.3 Purpose of the Study 2
1.4 Research Questions 3
1.5 Significance of the Study 3
1.6 Organization of the Dissertation 4
II. Literature Review 4
2.1 Positioning of This Study: The Reconfiguration of Labor in the Age of AI and Automation 4
2.2 Shadow Work and Invisible Labor 5
2.3 Digital Shadow Work 6
2.4 Domestic Humanoid Robots and the Reconfiguration of Household Labor 7
2.5 Continuity with the Prior Research 8
2.5.1 Study on Changes in the IT Work Environment in the Age of AI 8
2.5.2 Study on Changes in the Social Perception of AI Care Robots 9
2.5.3 Extension from Prior Q-Methodology Research 11
2.6 Research Model 11
III. Research Methodology 13
3.1 Research Design 13
3.2 Q Methodology 14
3.2.1 Rationale for Applying Q Methodology 14
3.2.2 Construction of the Q Sample 16
3.2.3 P Sample (Participants) 17
3.2.4 Q Sorting Procedure 18
3.2.5 Q Analysis 20
3.3 Fuzzy DEMATEL 21
3.3.1 Rationale for Applying Fuzzy DEMATEL 21
3.3.2 Expert Panel 22
3.3.3 Analysis Factors 23
3.3.4 Linguistic Scale and Triangular Fuzzy Numbers 24
3.3.5 Analysis Procedure 25
3.4 Integration of Q Methodology and Fuzzy DEMATEL 29
IV. Results 31
4.1 Results of the Q Methodology Analysis 31
4.1.1 Type 1: Managerial Realists 34
4.1.2 Type 2: Fairness-Sensitive Skeptics 34
4.1.3 Type 3: Efficiency-First Pragmatists 35
4.1.4 Type 4: Exploratory Optimists 35
4.1.5 Cross-Type Comparison: Shared and Divergent Points 36
4.1.6 Interpretive Insights from the Open-Ended Responses 38
4.2 Results of the Fuzzy DEMATEL Analysis 40
4.2.1 Characteristics of the Expert Panel and Inter-Expert Agreement 41
4.2.2 Group Direct-Influence Matrix 43
4.2.3 Total-Influence Matrix 44
4.2.4 Analysis of D, R, D+R, and D-R 45
4.2.5 Cause Factors and Effect Factors 46
4.2.6 Key Influence Paths 48
4.2.7 Robustness and Sensitivity Analysis 50
4.2.8 Cause-Effect Map and Influence Network 51
4.3 Integrated Interpretation of Q Methodology and Fuzzy DEMATEL 53
4.3.1 Managerial Realists and the Influence Structure 54
4.3.2 Fairness-Sensitive Skeptics and the Influence Structure 54
4.3.3 Efficiency-First Pragmatists and the Influence Structure 54
4.3.4 Exploratory Optimists and the Influence Structure 55
4.4 Summary of Results by Research Question. 57
4.4.1 Answer to RQ1 57
4.4.2 Answer to RQ2 60
V. Conclusion 60
5.1 Summary of the Study 60
5.2 Theoretical Implications 62
5.3 Practical Implications 63
5.4 Policy Implications 64
5.5 Limitations and Future Research 64
5.6 Concluding Remarks 66
References 67