청소년 공감 및 동정 척도(AMES)의 타당화 : 공감과 동정의 개념적 차별성을 중심으로
A Validation Study of Adolescent Measure of Empathy and Sympathy: Focused on Conceptual Difference between Empathy and Sympathy
초록/요약
본 연구는 다차원 개념인 공감의 하요소 공감과 동정의 개념 차이에 하여 소개하고 기존 청소년 공감 척도들의 한계을 보완할 수 있는 척도인 청소년 공감 동정 척도(Adolescent Measure of Empathy and Sympathy)를 타당화하고자 하다. 370개의 표본을 가지고 탐색 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 인지 공감과 정서 공감 그리고 동정의 3요인이 합 한 것으로 나타났다. 새로운 371개의 표본을 가지고 확인 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 3요인 모형에서 양호한 모형 합도가 나타났으며 3요인 모형이 단일 요인과 2요인 모형에 비해서 더 간명하다는 결과를 확인하다. 다음으로, 확인 요인분석의 표본 타당도 검증을 한 문항에 응답한 290개의 표본을 가지고 타당도 검증을 실시하다. 검증 결과, 청소년 공감 동정 척도의 수렴 타당도, 변별 타당도, 거련 타당도, 증분 타당도를 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과를 종합으로 보았을 때, 한국 청소년 공감 동정 척도는 신뢰할 수 있고 타당한 척도라는 것이 밝졌다. 마지막으로 연구의 의의 제한에 하여 논의하다.
more목차
I. 서론·················································1
II. 이론 배경············································4
1. 공감과 동정 개념의 역사와 두 개념의 비교 ·················4
(1) 동정(Sympathy)······································4
(2) 공감(Empathy)·······································6
1) 공감의 구성요소········································6
2) 인지 공감과 정서 공감···································8
(3) 공감과 동정의 개념 비교································9
2. 청소년 공감 척도······································11
(1) 기존의 청소년 공감 척도들의 한계·······················11
(2) 청소년 공감 동정척도(AMES)···························13
3. 공감 동정과 사회 행동, 성격 특성과의 연성···············14
(1) 친사회 행동·········································14
(2) CU(Callous-Unemotional) 특질·······················15
III. 연구 목적 및 가설···································17
1. 연구 목적············································17
2. 연구 문제············································17
3. 용어의 정의··········································18
IV. 연구 방법···········································20
1. 연구 대상············································20
2. 측정 도구············································21
(1) 청소년 공감 동정 척도(AMES)··························21
(2) 한국판 대인관계 반응성 척도(K-IRI)·····················21
(3) 친사회적 행동 질문지··································22
(4) 한국판 CU특질 척도(K-ICU)····························22
3. 연구 절차············································23
(1) 척도 번안···········································23
(2) 탐색적 요인분석······································24
(3) 확인적 요인분석······································24
(4) 타당도 검증·········································24
V. 연구 결과············································25
1. 탐색적 요인분석·······································25
2. 확인적 요인분석·······································28
3. 타당도 검증··········································30
(1) 수렴 변별 타당도·····································31
(2) 준거관련 타당도······································33
(3) 증분 타당도·········································34
VI. 논의···············································35
참고 문헌···············································42
부록···················································52
Abstract···············································59
