검색 상세

EXAMING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ILL-REGULATION AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE : CASE STUDY: CAMEROON’S TELECOMMUNICATION SECTOR

초록/요약

ABSTRACT Ill-regulation can only be determined when there is a consistent negative performance as a result of the law. Arguments in this study provide that there is a relationship between regulations and FDI performance in Cameroon. FDI is usually expected to provide capital for investment and help to boost the economy of Host countries. This research seeks to examine why the expected premise has not been the case in most developing countries. With the use of a qualitative research design, this study makes particular focus on ill-regulation and negative FDI performance. It provides an examination of the regulations governing FDI in Cameroon and instances were such laws may have been ill-regulated. Other findings are supported by observations and interviews which indicate that the negative performance of FDI in host countries can be linked to its regulations. Regulations in Cameroon have failed to provide incentives to domestic investors creating a platform of uneven competition between domestic and foreign investors. It is the role of legislators to implement laws that can provide positive effects.

more

목차

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abstract …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….. i
Table of Contents ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. ii
List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…………… v
List of Statutes ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..……. vi
Abbreviations …………………………………………………………….……………………………………………….………… vii
Chapter 1: Introduction ……………………….………………………………………………………………………..………… 1
1.1. Definition of terms ………………….………………………………..…………………………………………………. 2
1.2. Background ………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………. 4
1.3. Literature Review …..……………………………….………………………………………………..…………………. 7
1.4. Statement of Problem …..……………………….………………………………………………..………….…….. 12
1.5. Statement of purpose ………….……………….………………………………………………..……….………… 12
1.6. Research Question ……………………………………………………………………………………..…..…………. 13
1.7. Hypothesis ………………………………………………………………………………..………………………..……… 13
1.8. Significance of Study …..…….………………………………………………………………………………..……… 13
1.9. Methodology …..……………………………………………………………………………..……………………….… 14
Chapter 2: The Legal Framework Regulating Foreign Direct Investment in Cameroon ….…….... 15
2.1. National and International Instruments Regulating FDI in Cameroon ……………………..… 16
2.1.1. National Instruments Regulating FDI in Cameroon …………………………………………………….. 16
2.1.2. International Instruments Regulating FDI in Cameroon …………………………………………….. 21
2.2. The impact of ill-regulation on FDI performance …………………………………………………….…. 25
2.2.1. The impact of ill-regulation ………………………………………………………..….………………………….. 25
2.2.2. Reasons for Ill-regulation …………………………………………………..….………………………………….. 27
Chapter 3: An Empirical Analysis on the Impact of Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment in Cameroons Telecommunication Sector …………………………………………………………………………….…… 30
3.1. The Regulation of Telecommunications in Cameroon ………………………………………………… 31
3.1.1. The legal Framework regulating Telecommunications in Cameroon ………………………….. 32
3.1.2. The Institutional Framework Regulating Telecommunications in Cameroon …………..…. 34
3.2. Negative Performance in Relation to Ill-regulation …………………………………………………….. 38
3.2.1. High Prices and Inadequate Telecommunications Connectivity ………………………..……….. 39
3.2.2. Market Monopoly and Uneven Competition ………………………………………………….….………. 41
Chapter 4: Methods ……………………………………………………..….………………………………………….……….. 45
4.1. Setting and Sample ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 46
4.1.1. Setting ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….. 46
4.1.2. Sample ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…… 47
4.2. Materials and Data Collected ……………………………………………..……………………………………… 48
4.2.1. Materials Used ………………………………………………………………………………………………….………. 48
4.2.2. Data Collection ……………………………………………………………………………………………….………… 49
Chapter 5: Results, Limitations, Conclusion and Recommendations ………………………………..……. 50
5.1. Results ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 51
5.1.1. Method of Observation ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 51
5.1.2. Interviews ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 54
5.2. Conclusion and Recommendations ………………..……………………………………………………….….. 60
5.2.1. Conclusion ……………………………………………………..………………………………………………………….. 60
5.2.2. Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………………..… 62
References .................................................................................................................................. 64

more