Chinese and OECD-DAC aid, complimentary or conflicting: A challenge to the health sector of cameroon
- 발행기관 아주대학교
- 지도교수 Kim Heung-kyu
- 발행년도 2015
- 제출일 2014-12
- 학위수여년월 2015. 2
- 학위명 석사
- 학과 국제대학원 국제개발협력과
- 실제URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ajou/000000019199
- 본문언어 영어
- 저작권 아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
초록/요약
ABSTRACT Foreign assistance could be seen far back during the Marshal Law for the reconstruction of Europe and that of developing countries, especially Africa, from the 1960s with the introduction of the organization for economic cooperation and development (OECD). Recently however, new development donors – BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) – mainly China, have derailed from the rules established by traditional donors. This has consequently sparked up scholarly and political debates as to the impact of such aid to developing nations. In fact, the lack of ample information, non-interventionist tendency to recipients’ local politics, and neglect of human rights abuses during disbursement of China’s foreign assistance, China’s aid to developing countries over the last few decades has been one of most contentious development prospects. Based on a vigorous infrastructural expansion towards enhancing better opportunities to developing countries (thus Cameroon), China’s aid has called world attention, stunning friends and rivals alike. While some see these numerous aid as win-win, others ponder on the potential role of China’s development aid effectiveness to recipient countries’ health welfare and independence. This research paper thus exposes how similar or conflicting is Chinese aid to OECD-DAC aid and which fits best as enhancer of the health domain in Cameroon. It also attempts to verify the impact of OECD-DAC ODA and Chinese aids to the health welfare of Cameroonians. The research equally analyses how the non-official exposure of ample information by Chinese aid agencies undermine accountability and good governance in Cameroon. This research also adds to the ongoing debate in socio-political and academics circles on the long run outcome of these recent aid partners to developing countries. Overall, this paper seeks to clarify some sharks of doubt and settle some dust on the impact of these aid to Africa as a whole and Cameroon in particular.
more목차
Table of contents
Abstract.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. iii
Acknowledgement.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. iv
List of figures and tables.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. v
Abbreviations.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. vi
Table of contents .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. vii
CHAPTER ONE: General Introduction
1.1 Introduction.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1
1.2 Research Design. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 7
1.3 Methodology .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 9
1.4 Summary .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10
CHAPTER TWO: Establishing OECD-DAC and Chinese aid models
2.1OECD-DAC model . . .. .. .. .. .. .. 13
2.2 Chinese model .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 20
CHAPTER THREE: Literature Review
3.1 Review of the literature .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 25
3.2 Effectiveness and scope of foreign aid .. .. .. .. .. 26
3.3 Which is better for Africa, OECD-DAC or Chinese aid? .. .. .. 30
3.4 Mechanisms for foreign aid for developing countries .. .. .. .. 31
3.5 Summary .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 33
CHAPTER FOUR: Historical and Health overview
4.1 Historical and theoretical relationship .. .. .. .. .. 35
4.2 Health overview of Cameroon .. .. .. .. .. .. 36
CHAPTER FIVE: Data Analysis and Results
5.1 OECD-DAC and Chinese aid evaluation and assessments to health in Cameroon . 39
5.2 Availability of funds .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 41
5.3 Tabulated impact analysis. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 43
CHAPTER Six: Recommendations and Conclusion
6.1 Recommendations .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 58
6.2 Summary .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 60
References
