EVALUATTION OF PORT PREFERENCE AND FACTORS AFFECTING IT
- 발행기관 아주대학교
- 지도교수 SUNG MIN JAE
- 발행년도 2013
- 제출일 2013-12-27
- 학위수여년월 2014. 2
- 학위명 석사
- 학과 국제대학원 국제경영학과
- 실제URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/ajou/000000016191
- 본문언어 영어
- 저작권 아주대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
초록/요약
The coming of globalization has greatly contributed to the increase in world trade volumes. As Companies goes Multinational, the idea of which port to use in the area of target is always an important factor to be considered. Evaluating Ports shows wide variety of vital factors to be reckoned with. With increasing competition in the port industry, there is a need for ports to able to upgrade their services in order to remain competitive. In this study, I compare four ports, three from the African region and one from Asia, being; Douala Port, Lome Port, Durban port and Incheon Port respectively. I then focus on how to improve the efficiency of services at the Douala Port, Cameroon, using the Port of Incheon, South Korea as the control Key words; Competitive advantage, Consistency Ratios, AHP-Model, GDP, Efficiency, Douala Port , Incheon Port
more목차
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION/LITERATURE REVIEW
1.1: Introduction………………………………………………………1
1.2: Literature review…………………………………………………..3
CHAPTER TWO: RESEARCHMETHODOLOGY/DATACOLLECTION
2.1: Analytical Hierarchy Process…………………………………………………………8
2.2: Survey data collection………………………………………………………………….11
2.3: Other data……………………………………………………………………………………12
2.4: Model Diagram……………………………………………………………………………13
CHAPTER THREE: PORTS DETAILS
3.1 Douala port………………………………………………………...14
3.2 Lome Port ………………………………………………………….19
3.3 Durban port ………………………………………………………..22
3.4 Incheon port………………………………………………………..26
3.5 Sub-criteria analysis ……………………………………………….30
3.5.1 Douala port ………………………………………………………30
3.5.2 Lome port………………………………………………………...31
3.5.3 Durban port………………………………………………………32
3.5.4 Incheon Port……………………………………………………...33
CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS/DISCUSSION…………………….
4.1: Ranking and consistency ratios…………………………………………….35
4.2 Evaluation of Competitiveness …………………………………………….36
4.3 Criteria summary……………………………………………………….36
4.4 Discussion of results………………………………………………………………………42
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
5.1: Conclusion………………………………………………………..46
5.2: Recommendation to Douala Port…………………………………46
REFERENCES:
Appendix 1: Average Weights of criteria/sub-criteria obtained from survey....................................................................................................................
